Password Auditing & Defensive Tools
Authorized defensive use only.
This page provides information about password-auditing tools for **lawful**, authorized security testing, lab research, and defensive analysis. No exploit code, attack payloads, or reproduction steps are published here. Always obtain written authorization, use isolated labs, and follow applicable laws and vendor disclosure practices.
2 Defensive Overview: Cracking Tools (Authorized Learning)
This section is intended for lawful, authorized learning, lab testing, and defensive analysis. It deliberately omits commands or step-by-step instructions that would enable misuse.
2.1 Short catalogue β tool names & legitimate uses
-
Hashcat β password-auditing toolkit (official docs)
GPU-accelerated password/hash analysis used for offline hash auditing and measuring KDF resistance (authorized contexts).Note
-
John the Ripper
A versatile offline password auditor supporting many hash formats for password-strength assessments.
-
RainbowCrack / Ophcrack
Precomputed table approach (timeβmemory trade-off) historically used to reverse unsalted hashes; highlights why salts matter.
-
THC-Hydra / Medusa
Network authentication testers for testing remote auth policies (rate limits, lockouts) β only in-scope and authorized tests.
-
Aircrack-ng suite
Wireless assessment suite used in authorized Wi-Fi audits to validate configuration and defenses.
-
Metasploit Framework
Modular penetration-testing framework used for emulation and validating mitigations in scoped engagements.
-
Wordlist generators and examples (use synthetic or vendor-supplied test lists; avoid leaked datasets).
Tools and lists to generate candidate passwords for simulation and risk measurement.
2.2 Why study these (defensive reasons)
- Validate password policies, KDF choices, and remediation priorities.
- Tune SIEM/EDR detections for cracking-related patterns (CPU/GPU spikes, mass auth failures).
- Verify wireless configuration resilience and rogue-AP detection.
- Train incident response teams on what to look for in authorized environments.
2.3 Safe lab & RoE checklist (must-do before hands-on)
- Written authorization & RoE: Signed scope, allowed targets, schedule, escalation contacts.
- Isolated lab: Virtual networks, VLANs, or air-gapped setups. No production targets.
- Synthetic data: Use test accounts and synthetic hashes β never real user credentials.
- Centralized logging: Collect endpoint process telemetry, GPU/CPU metrics, and PCAP (if needed) for detection tuning.
- Snapshots & backups: VM snapshots before/after tests for recovery and post-mortem.
3 Detection signals & telemetry (practical defensive)
3.1 Telemetry fields to collect
timestamp, host, process_name, process_cmdline, user, parent_processβ link suspicious processes to accounts and hosts.cpu_percent, gpu_util, open_files, file_hashβ detect high resource usage related to cracking or large file access.auth_event (username, src_ip, result, failure_count)β detect brute-force patterns.- Network connection logs and (authorized)
pcapto catch injection or deauth behaviours for Wi-Fi tests.
3.2 High-level detection rule templates (pseudocode)
Use these as conceptual templates and convert to your product's query language (Splunk, Elastic, Sigma, etc.).
- Unusual GPU usage: If
cpu_percent > XANDgpu_util > Yon a non-lab host for > T minutes β Investigate process and file activity. - Mass authentication failures: If
auth_failure_count > Nwithin M minutes for a user or source IP β Alert / block / require MFA. - Large offline hash export: If file access matches
\.(sam|ntds|sql|dump)$AND exported externally β High-priority containment. - Wi-Fi injection / deauth: If deauth frame rate > threshold on managed APs β Alert for injection or rogue actor.
3.3 Tuning and false positives
Start with conservative thresholds in production and validate/tune in a lab. Correlate multiple signals (resource usage + file access + network egress) before taking automated containment actions.
4 Rules of Engagement (RoE) checklist
- Authorization: Names, PO, legal sign-off, signatures from asset owners.
- Scope: IPs, hosts, apps, SSIDs; explicit exclusions.
- Schedule & Contacts: Test windows and emergency escalation numbers.
- Allowed tools & forbidden techniques: High-level list of allowed tools (names ok) and forbidden actions (social engineering, destructive payloads) unless separately approved.
- Data handling: How test outputs (hash files, screenshots) are stored, transmitted, redacted, and destroyed.
- Backout & recovery: Snapshot restore procedures and rollback plan.
- Reporting & retest: Deliverable formats, remediation retest schedule.
5 Learning roadmap (authorized & progressive)
- Foundations: TCP/IP, authentication concepts, cryptographic hashes, KDFs (salt/pepper), Linux basics.
- Defensive tools: Wireshark, OSQuery, EDR fundamentals, SIEM querying.
- Controlled exercises: Use legal CTFs and platforms (TryHackMe, Hack The Box, VulnHub).
- Password auditing (lab only): Conceptually study KDF cost vs. recovery effort β do not use real production hashes.
- Wireless lab: Observe handshake flows and defensive indicators without testing external networks.
- Adversary emulation: Simulate attacker TTPs in-lab to test detections and run post-mortems.
6 Resources & references
- Hashcat official project
- Metasploit Framework
- NIST SP 800-63B
- OWASP / PTES
- Training platforms: TryHackMe, Hack The Box, VulnHub (legal targets for practice).