Cracking Tools
2 Defensive Overview: Cracking Tools (Authorized Learning)
This section is intended for lawful, authorized learning, lab testing, and defensive analysis. It deliberately omits commands or step-by-step instructions that would enable misuse.
2.1 Short catalogue β tool names & legitimate uses
-
Hashcat
GPU-accelerated password/hash analysis used for offline hash auditing and measuring KDF resistance (authorized contexts).Note
-
John the Ripper
A versatile offline password auditor supporting many hash formats for password-strength assessments.
-
RainbowCrack / Ophcrack
Precomputed table approach (timeβmemory trade-off) historically used to reverse unsalted hashes; highlights why salts matter.
-
THC-Hydra / Medusa
Network authentication testers for testing remote auth policies (rate limits, lockouts) β only in-scope and authorized tests.
-
Aircrack-ng suite
Wireless assessment suite used in authorized Wi-Fi audits to validate configuration and defenses.
-
Metasploit Framework
Modular penetration-testing framework used for emulation and validating mitigations in scoped engagements.
-
Crunch, CeWL, rockyou, maskprocessor
Tools and lists to generate candidate passwords for simulation and risk measurement.
2.2 Why study these (defensive reasons)
- Validate password policies, KDF choices, and remediation priorities.
- Tune SIEM/EDR detections for cracking-related patterns (CPU/GPU spikes, mass auth failures).
- Verify wireless configuration resilience and rogue-AP detection.
- Train incident response teams on what to look for in authorized environments.
2.3 Safe lab & RoE checklist (must-do before hands-on)
- Written authorization & RoE: Signed scope, allowed targets, schedule, escalation contacts.
- Isolated lab: Virtual networks, VLANs, or air-gapped setups. No production targets.
- Synthetic data: Use test accounts and synthetic hashes β never real user credentials.
- Centralized logging: Collect endpoint process telemetry, GPU/CPU metrics, and PCAP (if needed) for detection tuning.
- Snapshots & backups: VM snapshots before/after tests for recovery and post-mortem.
3 Detection signals & telemetry (practical defensive)
3.1 Telemetry fields to collect
timestamp, host, process_name, process_cmdline, user, parent_process
β link suspicious processes to accounts and hosts.cpu_percent, gpu_util, open_files, file_hash
β detect high resource usage related to cracking or large file access.auth_event (username, src_ip, result, failure_count)
β detect brute-force patterns.- Network connection logs and (authorized)
pcap
to catch injection or deauth behaviours for Wi-Fi tests.
3.2 High-level detection rule templates (pseudocode)
Use these as conceptual templates and convert to your product's query language (Splunk, Elastic, Sigma, etc.).
- Unusual GPU usage: If
cpu_percent > X
ANDgpu_util > Y
on a non-lab host for > T minutes β Investigate process and file activity. - Mass authentication failures: If
auth_failure_count > N
within M minutes for a user or source IP β Alert / block / require MFA. - Large offline hash export: If file access matches
\.(sam|ntds|sql|dump)$
AND exported externally β High-priority containment. - Wi-Fi injection / deauth: If deauth frame rate > threshold on managed APs β Alert for injection or rogue actor.
3.3 Tuning and false positives
Start with conservative thresholds in production and validate/tune in a lab. Correlate multiple signals (resource usage + file access + network egress) before taking automated containment actions.
4 Rules of Engagement (RoE) checklist
- Authorization: Names, PO, legal sign-off, signatures from asset owners.
- Scope: IPs, hosts, apps, SSIDs; explicit exclusions.
- Schedule & Contacts: Test windows and emergency escalation numbers.
- Allowed tools & forbidden techniques: High-level list of allowed tools (names ok) and forbidden actions (social engineering, destructive payloads) unless separately approved.
- Data handling: How test outputs (hash files, screenshots) are stored, transmitted, redacted, and destroyed.
- Backout & recovery: Snapshot restore procedures and rollback plan.
- Reporting & retest: Deliverable formats, remediation retest schedule.
5 Learning roadmap (authorized & progressive)
- Foundations: TCP/IP, authentication concepts, cryptographic hashes, KDFs (salt/pepper), Linux basics.
- Defensive tools: Wireshark, OSQuery, EDR fundamentals, SIEM querying.
- Controlled exercises: Use legal CTFs and platforms (TryHackMe, Hack The Box, VulnHub).
- Password auditing (lab only): Conceptually study KDF cost vs. recovery effort β do not use real production hashes.
- Wireless lab: Observe handshake flows and defensive indicators without testing external networks.
- Adversary emulation: Simulate attacker TTPs in-lab to test detections and run post-mortems.
6 Resources & references
- Hashcat official project
- Metasploit Framework
- NIST SP 800-63B
- OWASP / PTES
- Training platforms: TryHackMe, Hack The Box, VulnHub (legal targets for practice).